Florida A&M
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
620  Judith Kibii JR 21:06
1,347  Emmax Kiplagat FR 21:53
1,623  Fridah Limo SO 22:10
2,239  Caroline Kiplagat SO 22:50
2,349  QuanDra Shanks SR 22:57
2,456  Emmaculate Kiplagat SO 23:06
2,468  Nicole Kvitkauskas JR 23:07
2,903  Naomi Tanui JR 23:58
3,181  Destiny Johnson JR 24:49
3,324  April Polite JR 25:32
National Rank #216 of 344
South Region Rank #26 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 24th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 2.8%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Judith Kibii Emmax Kiplagat Fridah Limo Caroline Kiplagat QuanDra Shanks Emmaculate Kiplagat Nicole Kvitkauskas Naomi Tanui Destiny Johnson April Polite
Gator Cross Country Invitational 09/24 1219 20:50 21:38 22:11 23:10 22:47 22:55 23:15 24:33 24:46 26:12
FSU Invitational 10/07 1236 21:03 21:47 21:50 22:40 23:41 23:09 22:58 23:36 24:33 25:32
Berry Invitational 10/15 1228 21:06 21:47 21:56 22:11 23:09 22:41 22:45 23:56 25:01 25:35
MEAC Championship 10/29 1294 21:36 22:36 22:52 22:55 23:01 24:00 23:31





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 24.8 697 0.1 0.3 0.4 2.1 4.5 11.3 13.9 14.4 13.3 13.7 10.7 8.7 4.9 1.5 0.6



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Judith Kibii 60.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3
Emmax Kiplagat 116.2
Fridah Limo 135.7
Caroline Kiplagat 191.0
QuanDra Shanks 201.0
Emmaculate Kiplagat 210.0
Nicole Kvitkauskas 211.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 0.1% 0.1 17
18 0.3% 0.3 18
19 0.4% 0.4 19
20 2.1% 2.1 20
21 4.5% 4.5 21
22 11.3% 11.3 22
23 13.9% 13.9 23
24 14.4% 14.4 24
25 13.3% 13.3 25
26 13.7% 13.7 26
27 10.7% 10.7 27
28 8.7% 8.7 28
29 4.9% 4.9 29
30 1.5% 1.5 30
31 0.6% 0.6 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0